Songs and dance in movies are a unique feature in Indian brand of
cinema, at least in the over the top popular cinema. Music and songs are so
intricately woven in the fabric of our movies that often a movie’s potential
for being a hit or flop is heavily dependent on its music and songs.
Of course the first of the movies were mute and hence the
script was written and performed in a novel way to get the message across to
the audience by means of gestures and elaborate expressions of the actors.
But
as soon as the talking feature films made their arrival in the theatres of
India, the songs sneaked into the movies as innocuously as spoken words. It was
a normal thing to have song and dance along with the dialogues in movies.
This is not the case with world cinema where songs in movies
is a rarest of the rare event, for the simple reason that songs don’t blend
with the pace and entity of the script and risks jeopardizing the theme of a
movie.
How and why then Indian movies began to groove to the
musical notes?
Perhaps this trait was inherited from the nautanki, natak, swang, drama theatre which preceded the cinema by
centuries. Even now in the hinterlands the travelling theatre groups and for
that matter the annual stage-events of the Ram Lila performed by amateur artists
continue to have song and dance and rhymed dialogues, half spoken and half sung
and full songs at regular intervals.
So maybe, the pioneers of Indian cinema were too
conservative and naïve to imagine a cinematic experience without the
quintessential song and dance play up with the script and hence supported it
passionately in holding the audience awake and interested in the happenings on
the big screen, the bada parda. There
could be a counter view that the audience might not like movies without songs!
The third decade of the last century produced the first
talking film of India – Alam Ara.
The
1931 release Alam Ara had seven songs, and that set the trend. As is the case
with theatre and nautanki, the lead
actors were to have a rich baritone, a powerful voice which could shoot a
dialogue and sing a song without much a difficulty!
So we have the likes of KL Sehgal and others who performed
both ways as actor and singer in the thirties and early forties. While KL
Sehgal did enthuse the audience with his singing, others were at best tolerable
singers. When it came to acting and dialogue delivery the singers did no better
than what the actors did while singing. Still they were a hit and ruled the roost as
motion picture was a new phenomenon and watching a movie was an extraordinary
experience in itself. Moreover, singing actors were more authentic and
familiar.
Soon the technological advance made it possible to
superimpose vocals on actors which made way for lip-syncing. This was straight from
heaven for it brought about the ultimate idea of playback singers in movies.
Yes, from now onward, real singers would record songs and actors would do
lip-syncing before the camera. More than anyone else the actors were much relieved
by this invention. This heralded the era of music directors and playback
singers.
The actors’ job became less stressed as now they were saved
from mouthing out songs that required rhythm, sur and a pleasing voice. The lead actors could now focus on their
acting solely. Likewise the singers were relieved too and yes, more that anyone else, the poor audience
too had a better time in the cinema halls. The combination of drama and
situational songs were to usher them in a surreal world for those two to three
hours.
But it wasn’t just about fitting a song here and another
there between the scenes, soon the film makers realized that song should be
situation based or at times a scene should be so created as to fit a song in
that situation. Either way songs have to go along with drama and support the
varied emotions of love, sorrow, joy, separation, heartbreak, oppression,
patriotism, morality, duty, revenge, resolve et al.
Soon the job of a lyricist and music composer became more
demanding and important. Music could
make a movie hit, it can supersede a mediocre script and magnify a good
story-line. Songs could also be a bridge between different parts of a story and
could even be used as theme throughout the narration. They could also provide a
break from highly charged emotional veritable or would augment elements of a
script for an elongated effect.
However, with time, song became indispensable. Often songs are used without the question of a
need. They are needed because a movie has to have them. A movie without songs
is a rarity in popular Indian cinema. What would the audience talk about a
movie if it didn’t have good songs? Indeed, script and acting are important
but still songs are needed to complete the movie, it’s an indispensable part.
Sound tracks can very well support an annoying script or irritating acting, so be
on the safer side. Add five-six songs and let the audience too have a breather!
Songs could claim half of the movie budget and time. A
movie’s song album is released weeks before the release of the movie and given
a grand ceremony by way of music launch of the film. Money making is a costly
job and stakes are high and so the value of music.
Whereas the Indian popular cinema has come a long way in the
last 80 years, curiously the old charmer hasn’t changed much. The nautanki and Ram Lila continue to
enthrall the countryside albeit they too have made some technical advances by
means of hanging mikes and ruefully lip-syncing to popular Bollywood tracks in
their act.
Still the roots of Indian cinema are preserved in the form of nautanki party and Ram Lila and other
such drama ensembles in the parts of the country to an extent.
Generally songs had instant effect on the naïve audience.
They provided them a look into a surreal world. Easy lyrics tuned into hummable
songs made it easy for them to remember the movie and became a pull-factor for
masses to throng the cinema halls.